MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Coffee Consumption on the Incidence and Severity of Post Dural Puncture Headache among Post Cesarean Section Women

2019· article· en· W3017359730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wafaa T Elgzar, Violet Nicola Ghattas

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth Asian Research Journal of Nursing and Healthcare · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Venom Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Section (typography)Post-dural-puncture headacheConsumption (sociology)ObstetricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is the most prevalent complication after lumbar puncture (LP), with reported frequency varying from 6% to 36% of patients.Aim: investigate the effect of coffee consumption on the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache among post cesarean section women.Research design: Randomized controlled clinical trial.Setting: Postpartum department at Damanhour National Medical institute/ Elbehira governorate.Egypt.Sample: 120 women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to study and control group using randomization block.Tools: three tools were used for data collection.Structured interview schedule to collect basic data, headache assessment tool (visual analogue pain scale, short-form McGill pain questionnaire, assessment of headache aggravating and alleviating factors) and physical activities limitation questionnaire.Results: The incidence and severity of PDPH is higher among control more than coffee group.While, the maximum incidence of continuous PDPH occurs in the third post-operative day among control group (40%) compared to only 13.3% among intervention.Both VAS and McGill Pain score are statistically higher among control compared to intervention group over several time points.PDPH is aggravated by light, noise, standing, moving and siting in control groups than intervention groups.Laying down, closing eyes, drinking fluids are major soothing factors for both groups.The highest percentages of coffee group had no effect on activity of daily living compared to control group.The differences between the two groups are statistically significant intergroup, intragroup and for group time interactions.Conclusion: Coffee decreased both incidence and severity of PDPH and increased tolerance of post Cs activities.Recommendations: Oral coffee may be added to post Cs nursing care protocols to decrease PDPH incidence, severity and enhancing early physical activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth Asian Research Journal of Nursing and HealthcareSame topicHealthcare and Venom ResearchFrench-language works237,207