MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Coffee Consumption on the Incidence and Severity of Post Dural Puncture Headache among Post Cesarean Section Women

2019· article· en· W3017359730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth Asian Research Journal of Nursing and Healthcare · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Venom Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Section (typography)Post-dural-puncture headacheConsumption (sociology)ObstetricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is the most prevalent complication after lumbar puncture (LP), with reported frequency varying from 6% to 36% of patients. Aim: investigate the effect of coffee consumption on the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache among post cesarean section women. Research design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: Postpartum department at Damanhour National Medical institute/ Elbehira governorate. Egypt. Sample: 120 women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to study and control group using randomization block. Tools: three tools were used for data collection. Structured interview schedule to collect basic data, headache assessment tool (visual analogue pain scale, short-form McGill pain questionnaire, assessment of headache aggravating and alleviating factors) and physical activities limitation questionnaire. Results: The incidence and severity of PDPH is higher among control more than coffee group. While, the maximum incidence of continuous PDPH occurs in the third post-operative day among control group (40%) compared to only 13.3% among intervention. Both VAS and McGill Pain score are statistically higher among control compared to intervention group over several time points. PDPH is aggravated by light, noise, standing, moving and siting in control groups than intervention groups. Laying down, closing eyes, drinking fluids are major soothing factors for both groups. The highest percentages of coffee group had no effect on activity of daily living compared to control group. The differences between the two groups are statistically significant intergroup, intragroup and for group time interactions. Conclusion: Coffee decreased both incidence and severity of PDPH and increased tolerance of post Cs activities. Recommendations: Oral coffee may be added to post Cs nursing care protocols to decrease PDPH incidence, severity and enhancing early physical activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it