MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017440755 · doi:10.26443/crae.v46i2.79

Book review for Crits: A student manual, by Terry Barrett / Critique de livre du Crits: A Student Manual, par Terry Barrett

2019· article· fr· W3017440755 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lorrie Blair

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsArtVisual artsHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review: Crits: A Student Manual, by Terry Barrett. London, England, Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019, 188 pp., ISBN:978-1-3500-4159-2. Keywords: Crits; Visual arts; Art education; Student manual.Critique de livre: Crits: A Student Manual, by Terry Barrett. London, England, Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019, 188 pp., ISBN:978-1-3500-4159-2 Mots-clés : crits ; arts visuels; éducation artistique ; manuel de l’étudiant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistiqueSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207