MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017441855 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000182019

Lack of Histological and Molecular Signature Response to Tocilizumab in Kidney Transplants with Chronic Active Antibody Mediated Rejection: A Case Series

2020· article· en· W3017441855 on OpenAlex
Dhiren Kumar, Idris Yakubu, Frough Safavi, Marlon F. Levy, Irfan Moinuddin, Pamela Kimball, Layla Kamal, Anne L. King, Davis Massey, Philip F. Halloran, Gaurav Gupta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney360 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsThe Metabolomics Innovation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTocilizumabRenal functionInternal medicineAdverse effectGastroenterologySingle CenterBiopsyKidneyUrologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Traditional therapies for caAbMR have unclear efficacy with significant side effects in recipients of kidney transplants (KTs). A recent single-center case series suggested tocilizumab (TCZ) could stabilize renal function and improve microvascular inflammation. Here we report our findings of the use of TCZ in patients with caAbMR. Methods Ten adult recipients of KTs with biopsy-proven caAbMR were treated with TCZ at 8 mg/kg per month. Patients were monitored for adverse events, and therapy was interrupted in the setting of serious infections. Six patients (60%) underwent post-treatment biopsies. Results Patients (mean age of 43 years) were initiated on TCZ at a median of 36 months post-KT. A majority of patients were black (70%), underwent regrafts (40%), and were sensitized (mean cPRA=41%). Patients received a median of six doses of TCZ (range=3–10). At a median follow-up of 12 months (range=8–24 months), renal function did not show improvement (mean eGFR, 42±18 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 to 37±24 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; P =0.27). The slope of decline in eGFR remained unchanged (−0.14±0.9 to −0.33±1.1; P =0.25). There was no improvement in mean MVI (g+ptc) (4.8±1.4 to 4.2±2.0; P =0.39) scores or Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) AbMR scores (0.79±0.17 to 0.78±0.26; P =0.86). There was a numeric worsening of chronicity (ci+ct) scores (2.5±0.8 to 3.3±1.7; P =0.38) and MMDx atrophy fibrosis scores (0.36±0.24 to 0.58±0.15; P =0.21). Patient survival was 90%, with one patient death due to complications from a hip infection. Overall death-censored graft survival was 80%, with two graft losses in patients who had recurrent infections requiring hospitalization. Conclusions In this early experience, we report a lack of efficacy and toxicity with the use of TCZ for caAbMR. Prospective clinical trials are needed to clarify the role of IL-6 blockade and the possibility of increased incidence of infections in patients with caAbMR who are treated with TCZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it