Subcorneal pustular dermatosis successfully treated withacitretin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction.Subcorneal pustular dermatosis is a rare and chronic dermatosis which often has a recurrent course.The differential diagnosis of the condition should include above all pustular psoriasis and IgA pemphigus.Objective.Presentation of a case of subcorneal pustular dermatosis successfully treated with acitretin.Case report.A 28-year-old male patient was admitted to the Department with extensive erythematous eruptions arranged in a polycyclic pattern with small pustules on the periphery.The findings of histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of subcorneal pustular dermatosis.After introducing treatment with acitretin a remission of skin lesions was achieved.Conclusions.The reported case and the literature data show that the differential diagnosis of subcorneal pustular dermatosis continues to be a clinical and histopathological challenge.Because of therapeutic differences associated with the disease entities in question, the establishment of correct diagnosis of subcorneal pustular dermatosis is especially important, while the improvement seen in the patient's condition confirms the efficacy of acitretin in the treatment of the disease. StReSzczenieWprowadzenie.Podrogowa dermatoza krostkowa jest rzadką i przewlekłą chorobą skóry, często o nawracającym przebiegu.W diagnostyce różnicowej należy uwzględnić przede wszystkim łuszczycę krostkową oraz pęcherzycę IgA.Cel pracy.Przedstawienie przypadku podrogowej dermatozy krostkowej skutecznie leczonej acytretyną.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".