MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017582681 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30057-7

Mercury exposure and premature mortality in the Grassy Narrows First Nation community: a retrospective longitudinal study

2020· article· en· W3017582681 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Aline Philibert, Myriam Fillion, Donna Mergler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDemographyLongitudinal studyLife expectancyMercury (programming language)Proportional hazards modelMedicineEnvironmental healthSurgeryPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the influence of toxic exposures on reduced life expectancy in First Nations people in Canada. The Grassy Narrows First Nation community have lived with the consequences of one of the worst environmental disasters in Canadian history. In the early 1960s, 10 000 kg of mercury (Hg) was released into their aquatic ecosystem. Although Hg concentration in fish, their dietary staple, decreased over time, it remains high. We aimed to examine whether elevated Hg exposure over time contributes to premature mortality (younger than 60 years) in this community. METHODS: We did longitudinal and case-control analyses with data for individuals of the Grassy Narrows First Nation community. In 2019, the community obtained their historical Hg biomarker data from a government surveillance programme, which was then shared with the authors. A matched-pair approach allowed us to compare longitudinal hair Hg concentration between cases (individuals who died aged younger than 60 years) and controls (individuals who lived beyond 60 years). Matching criteria included year of birth (allowing 2 years either side), sex, and a minimum of four hair Hg concentration measures, of which at least two were in the same year. Analyses included change-point detection, interrupted time series, mixed models, and Cox survival models. FINDINGS: We analysed data collected between Jan 1, 1970, and Jan 31, 1997, for 657 individuals (319 women and 338 men, born between 1884 and 1991) for whom we assembled a retrospective database of yearly measures of hair Hg concentration (n=3603). Hair Hg concentration decreased over time. A subgroup of 222 individuals (107 women and 115 men) reached or could have reached 60 years old by August, 2019. There was an increased risk of dying at a younger age among those with at least one hair Hg measure of 15 μg/g or more (adjusted hazard ratio 1·55, 95% CI 1·11-2·16; p=0·0088). Among the deceased individuals (n=154), longevity decreased by 1 year with every 6·25 μg/g (4·35-14·29) increase in hair Hg concentration. Analyses of 36 matched pairs showed that hair Hg concentration of those who died aged younger than 60 years was 4·7 times higher (3·4-5·9) than controls. INTERPRETATION: The consistent findings between our different analyses support an association between long-term Hg exposure from freshwater fish consumption and premature mortality in this First Nation community. There is a need to do risk-benefit analyses of freshwater fish consumption in environmentally contaminated regions. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207