MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W30178785 · doi:10.1039/c8cp02054j

3063 鉄筋補強鋼管コンクリート柱の中心圧縮載荷加熱試験(各種構造の耐火性 (2), 防火)

2006· article· en· W30178785 on OpenAlexfundno aff
憲一 池田, 啓二 中西, 秀人 齋藤

Bibliographic record

Venue学術講演梗概集. A-2, 防火,海洋,情報システム技術 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, we consider the self-regulated generation of spatially homogeneous low density plasma (LDP) micro-channels as a high intensity ionization source arising from the multi-filamentation of powerful femtosecond (fs) laser pulses in aqueous solutions. We investigate the modulation of the femtosecond laser multiple filamentation for tuning the size of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized in an irradiated gold chloride solution. Previous studies on the radiation-induced synthesis of colloidal gold by more conventional ionization sources, such as high energy γ-rays and electron beams, highlighted the dependence of the size distribution of AuNPs on the density of energy deposited per unit of time, i.e. the dose rate. The present method of laser-induced production of AuNPs rests on a similar radiation-assisted process, i.e. the reduction of the solvated trivalent gold ions by the hydrated electrons produced upon ionization of water. We find that trivial optical manipulation varies the rate of deposited energy by laser irradiation, which can be considered equivalent to a variation of the dose rate. We investigate the influence of varying the density of energy deposited on the laser-induced gold cluster size distribution and made a comparison with the high energy radiation-induced synthesis of AuNPs. Here, our results highlight that the present method of laser irradiation, in the regime of LDP generation, mimics the radiolysis of water at an adjustable high dose rate. More generally, these spatially and temporally resolved plasmas could be developed as a tool for the unprecedented control of chemistry under ionizing radiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue学術講演梗概集. A-2, 防火,海洋,情報システム技術Same topicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207