Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le contact avec la nature et les cultures traditionnelles est la base de l’ecotourisme, une nouvelle facon de voyager « responsable » qui a le vent en poupe. Son essor coincide avec le reveil des consciences sur les grands enjeux du XXIe siecle : proteger la planete et aider les populations en mal de developpement. Mais pour ne pas vous tromper de voyage et vous envoler vers des lieux bel et bien ecotouristiques, le Petit Fute, dans cette tout premiere edition, decrypte ce qu’est reellement l’ecotourisme et vous emmene ensuite dans 20 pays sur les 5 continents (l'Equateur, le Costa Rica, le Canada, le Gabon, le Cameroun, la Tanzanie, le Senegal, l'Inde, le Laos, l'Australie, Madagascar, la France, La Roumanie, la Finlande,...) a la decouverte des aires protegees (parcs nationaux, reserves naturelles, Reserve de biosphere…). Des adresses d'hebergements ecotouristiques et des informations pratiques permettront en outre de reussir un voyage 100 % responsable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".