MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diesel Reduction Opportunities in a Remote Isolated Community

2019· article· en· W3017979821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsATCO (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Diesel fuelBusinessComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diesel dependent remote communities have been the focus of many Canadian initiatives in recent years. Often, these areas house first nation communities and can be deprived of resources such as electricity and natural gas due to restricted accessibility. This could result in shortage of diesel because of the delivery difficulties. Driven by United Nations goals, countries across the globe have focused in developing these areas to improve the outlook of their residents. This includes the implementation of alternative sources of electricity. This paper presents the experience of a Canadian electric utility in investigating diesel reduction options in one of its largest remote communities. Currently, this system is diesel dependent and, due to the load growth, is facing risks of not having enough diesel supply to produce energy for an entire year. These alternatives focus on reducing electric technical losses, reducing electricity consumption, and offsetting some of the consumption through adopting solar (PV) generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207