MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3018032109

A Late Cretaceous polar forest, Emma Fjord, Northwest Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada: Paleobotany, Paleoecology and Paleoclimatology

2002· article· en· W3018032109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Csank

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleoecologyPaleobotanyPaleoclimatologyGeologyFjordTaphonomyCretaceousPaleontologyArcticQuaternaryOceanographyPhysical geographyClimate changeGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the Mesozoic to Early Cenozoic greenhouse climate phase forests grew well within the polar circle. These unique polar forest ecosystems flourished in a warm, high-latitude environment where trees were subjected to months of unbroken winter darkness followed by continuous daylight in the summer and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (c. 800 ppm). This thesis describes five anatomically preserved wood specimens from a new, Late Cretaceous-Earliest Tertiary, high-latitude (palaeolatitude of 74-78oN) fossil plant assemblage from Emma Fiord and Phillips Inlet, NW Ellesmere Island. The fossil wood occurs in the Campanian/Maastrichtian to Danian Hansen Point Volcanics of the Eureka Sound Group, Sverdrup Basin, a stratigraphic unit interpreted as originating in a volcanically disturbed, alluvial plain/peat mire setting close to the margins of the palaeo-Arctic Ocean. Quantitative analysis of anatomical features in petrographic thin sections enabled the wood specimens to be assigned to two conifer families, the Taxodiaceae and Pinaceae. One taxodiaceous species (Taxodioxylon albertense (Penhallow) Shimakura, 1937) and three pinaceous species (Piceoxylon ellesmerensis sp. nov., Pinuxylon woolardii (Tidwell, Parker and Folkman, 1986), Pinuxylon gemenii sp. nov.) were identified. Biometric analysis of the permineralized trunks suggests that the forest canopy was in the order of 15-20 m. Well-preserved growth rings indicate that these trees grew under a temperate climate with a high year-to-year variability characterized by frequent disturbances. Common traumatic rings indicate that one such disturbance process was the occurrence of sharp frosts towards the end of the growing season, while abundant false rings suggest that another may have been occasional flooding or ash falls. Finally, intra-annual phenological studies of growth rings suggest that trees possessed a mixture of habits, some being evergreen and other being deciduous. Although pinaceous conifers are the most common group represented by the permineralized woods, additional studies of charred woods, compressed foliage, and palynomorphs from the same site by Falcon-Lang, MacRae & Csank (unpubl. subm., 2002) demonstrate that taxodiaceous conifers were actually the dominant vegetation with pinaceous conifers occurring in only subordinate numbers, together with gingkos, angiosperms and ferns. Physiognomically, the nearest extant equivalent to these polar forests would be the cool-temperate Sequoia-Pseudotsuga forests of British Columbia. The data presented in this thesis therefore shed considerable new light on the community-scale ecology of North Hemisphere, Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary polar forests, and may provide a useful long-term context for the response of modern boreal forest ecosystems to future global climate change. Pages: 165 Supervisor: H. Falcon-Lang

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→