MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018093428 · doi:10.1136/rapm-2020-101534

Impact of COVID-19 on Pain Medicine Fellowship Training

2020· letter· en· W3018093428 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan M. Hagedorn, Susan M. Moeschler, Timothy Furnish, Dawood Sayed, Shravani Durbhakula

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Graduation (instrument)Quarter (Canadian coin)Medical education2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Pain managementClinical PracticeFamily medicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor Typically, the fourth quarter of the academic year brings with it the excitement of impending graduation for pain fellows, along with their preparation for independent practice. The last few months are spent fine-tuning skills, creating one’s own style of practice, and gaining

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0500.032
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegional Anesthesia & Pain MedicineSame topicIntramuscular injections and effectsFrench-language works237,207