Nonmotor Symptoms Affect Sleep Quality in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease Patients With or Without Cognitive Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients frequently present with sleep disorders. This study was designed to assess the impact of nonmotor symptoms (NMSs) on sleep quality in early-stage PD patients with and without cognitive dysfunction. Materials and Methods: A sample of 389 early-stage PD patients (modified Hoehn and Yahr score ≤2.5, duration ≤5 years) was recruited for the present study. The Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMS-Quest) was used to screen for global NMSs. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). PD motor symptoms were measured with the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS), part III. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to evaluate global cognitive status, and the PD Sleep Scale (PDSS) was used to quantify sleep quality. Polysomnography (PSG) was used for objective assessment of sleep. Results: In our sample, approximately one-quarter of the PD patients suffered from sleep disturbances (23.7%). Our results also confirmed the high prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with PD (39.8%). In patients with cognitive dysfunction, higher percentage of sleep disorders (34.8% vs 16.2%, P< 0.01) was observed. They also with lower PDSS score, sleep efficiency (SE) and longer sleep lantency (SL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) (All P< 0.05). In total, the patients who suffered from NMSs, such as depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, urinary tract symptoms and hallucinations/delusions, had poorer sleep quality. Better cognition may predict better sleep quality. In patients with cognitive dysfunction, the NMS-Hallucinations/delusions score was the most important risk factor for sleep disorders. In patients without cognitive dysfunction, NMSs such as anxiety and cognition and medication were related to sleep disorder. Conclusions: NMSs in early-stage PD are highly associated with and are determinants of subjective sleep quality. Future studies should focus on elucidating the pathophysiology of these symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".