MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STUDY AND SELECTION OF RAW MATERIAL FOR THE CREATION OF VARIETIES AND HYBRID POPULATIONS OF ALFALFA THAT ARE TOLERANT TO HIGH ACIDITY OF SOIL SOLUTION

2020· article· en· W3018276241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.D. Bugajov, V. S. Mamaliga, V.M. Gorenskij

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Association of Scientists · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDry matterYield (engineering)SowingAgronomyRaw materialMathematicsEnvironmental scienceBiologyHorticultureEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of collecting samples of alfalfa of different ecological and geographical origin for the collection of dry matter and seed yield on the background of high acidity of soil solution (pH 5,20-5,53) made it possible to identify perspectives for these indicators that can be used in further breeding work. The highest dry matter yield in the average of 3 years of research was obtained from the varieties Vavilovka (Rodnich) (Ukraine) (1.42 kg / m2), Banat (Serbia) (1.36 kg / m2) and Sowing 3022 (Uzbekistan) (1,22 kg / m2) at the yield of the Sinyukh standard of 1.08 kg / m2. Seeds of Zhidrune (Lithuania) (31.9 g / m2), Ferrax 58 (Canada) (29.9 g / m2) and Tibet (Kazakhstan) (28.5 g / m2) with yield of standard 23.5 g / m2 were the best seeds. Particularly noteworthy is Ferrax 58 (Canada), which has significantly exceeded the standard of seed yield and exceeded or exceeded the standard of dry matter during all years of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Association of ScientistsSame topicAgriculture and Biological StudiesFrench-language works237,207