MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018320680 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.30

Study of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math>Decays to Charmonium States:<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">K</mml:mi></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">c</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">K</mml:mi></mml:math>

2001· article· lv· W3018320680 on OpenAlexaff
K. W. Edwards, R. Janicek, P. M. Patel, A. J. Sadoff, R. Ammar, A. Bean, D. Besson, R. Davis, N. Kwak, X. Zhao, S. Anderson, V. Frolov, Y. Kubota, S. J. Lee, R. Mahapatra, J. J. O’Neill, R. Poling, T. Riehle, A. J. S. Smith, C. J. Stepaniak, J. Urheim, S. Ahmed, M. S. Alam, S. B. Athar, L. Jian, L. Ling, M. Saleem, S. Timm, F. Wappler, A. Anastassov, J. E. Duboscq, E. A. Eckhart, K. K. Gan, C. Gwon, T. Hart, K. Honscheid, D. Hufnagel, H. Kagan, R. Kass, T. K. Pedlar, H. Schwarthoff, J. B. Thayer, E. von Toerne, M. M. Zoeller, S. J. Richichi, H. Severini, P. Skubic, A. Undrus, S. Chen, J. Fast, J. W. Hinson, J. Lee, D. H. Miller, E. I. Shibata, I. P. J. Shipsey, V. Pavlunin, D. Cronin-Hennessy, A. L. Lyon, E. H. Thorndike, C. Jessop, H. Marsiske, M. Perl, V. Savinov, D. Ugolini, Xiang Zhou, T. E. Coan, V. Fadeyev, Y. Maravin, I. Narsky, R. Stroynowski, J. Ye, T. Wlodek, M. Artuso, R. Ayad, C. Boulahouache, K. Bukin, E. Dambasuren, S. Karamov, D. Majumder, G. C. Moneti, R. Mountain, S. Schuh, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, G. H. A. Viehhauser, J. C. Wang, A. Wolf, J. Wu, S. Köpp, A. H. Mahmood, S. E. Csorna, I. Dankó, K. W. McLean, S. Márka, Z. Xu, R. Godang, K. Kinoshita, I. C. Lai, S. Schrenk, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, S. McGee, L. P. Perera, G. J. Zhou, E. Lipeles, S. P. Pappas, M. Śchmidtler, A. Shapiro, W. Sun, A. J. Weinstein, F. Würthwein, D. E. Jaffe, G. Masek, H. P. Paar, E. M. Potter, S. Prell, V. Sharma, D. M. Asner, A. Eppich, T. S. Hill, R. J. Morrison, R. A. Briere, B. H. Behrens, W. T. Ford, A. V. Gritsan, J. Roy, J. G. Smith, J. Alexander, R. Baker, C. Bebek, B. E. Berger, K. Berkelman, F. Blanc, V. Boisvert, D. G. Cassel, M. Dickson, P. S. Drell, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, A. Foland, P. Gaidarev, L. Gibbons, B. Gittelman, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, P. I. Hopman, C. D. Jones, D. L. Kreinick, M. Lohner, A. Magerkurth, T. O. Meyer, N. B. Mistry, E. Nordberg, D. Peterson, D. Riley, J. G. Thayer, P. G. Thies, B. Valant-Spaight, A. Warburton, P. Avery, C. Prescott, A. I. Rubiera, J. Yelton, J. P. Zheng, G. Brandenburg, A. Ershov, Y. S. Gao, D. Y.-J. Kim, R. Wilson, T. E. Browder, Y. Li, J. L. Rodriguez, H. Yamamoto, T. Bergfeld, B. I. Eisenstein, J. Ernst, G. E. Gladding, G. D. Gollin, R. M. Hans, E. Johnson, I. Karliner, M. A. Marsh, M. Palmer, C. Plager, C. Sedlack, M. Selen, J. J. Thaler, J. C. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCarleton UniversityInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsFactorizationBranching fractionBranching (polymer chemistry)Particle physicsElectron–positron annihilationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)HadronAlgorithmMathematicsChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a sample of $9.66\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{6}B\overline{B}$ pairs collected with the CLEO detector we make the first observation of $B$ decays to an ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}$ and a kaon. We measure branching fractions $B({B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}{K}^{+})\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}({0.69}_{\ensuremath{-}0.21}^{+0.26}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.20)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ and $B(B\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}K\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}({1.09}_{\ensuremath{-}0.42}^{+0.55}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.12\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.31)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is from the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}$ branching fraction uncertainty. From these we extract the ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}$ decay constant in the factorization approximation, ${f}_{{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}335\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}75\mathrm{MeV}$. We also search for $B$ decays to a ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0}$ and a kaon. No evidence for a signal is found and we set $90%$ C.L. upper limits: $B({B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0}{K}^{+})&lt;4.8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ and $B(B\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0}K\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})&lt;5.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.010
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0110.012
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4390.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207