MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018447551 · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30316-9

Understanding spending trends for tuberculosis

2020· letter· en· W3018447551 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Zwerling

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberculosisDeclarationMedicinePandemicScopusEconomic growthGlobal healthTuberculosis controlHealth carePolitical scienceDiseaseFamily medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MEDLINEInfectious disease (medical specialty)Economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the tuberculosis community strives to work towards tuberculosis elimination goals, financing and spending continue to be crucial issues.1 Tuberculosis usually affects the most poor and vulnerable populations and resources have always been few and strained.2 Year after year, reports from WHO, STOP TB, and other advocacy groups show that tuberculosis spending is inadequate to diagnose and treat existing cases, and recent meetings such as the 2018 UN high-level meeting on tuberculosis have elicited pledges to improve resources and finances available in the fight against tuberculosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Infectious DiseasesSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207