Optimization of Genotype by Sequencing data for phylogenetic purposes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and reference genome pipelines can be used to assemble next generation sequences, and that several tree inference methodologies have been proposed for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, we test whether different alignments and phylogenetic approaches produce similar results. We also examined how the process of SNP identification and mapping can affect the consistency of the analyses. Different alignments and phylogenetic inferences produced consistent results, supporting the GBS approach for answering evolutionary questions on a macroevolutionary scale when the genetic distance among phenotypically identifiable clades is low. We highlight the importance of exploring the relationships among groups using different assembly assumptions and also distinct phylogenetic inference methods, particularly when addressing phylogenetic questions in genetic and morphologically conservative taxa. • The method uses the comparison of several filter settings, alignments, and tree inference approaches on Genotype by Sequencing data. • Consistent results were found among several approaches. • The methodology successfully recovered well supported species boundaries and phylogenetic relationships among species of mastiff bats not hypothesized by previous methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it