[Effects of telmisartan on the level of Aβ1-42, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor α and cognition in hypertensive patients with Alzheimer's disease].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-stimulating activity, on the levels of Aβ1-42, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cognition in elderly hypertensive patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A total of 48 patients with probable AD and essential hypertension were randomly assigned into telmisartan group (n = 24, 40 - 80 mg qd) or amlodipine group (n = 24, 5 - 10 mg qd) for 6 months at Henan Provincial People's Hospital during 2008 - 2011. Cognitive evaluations were assessed at pre-treatment and 24 weeks post-treatment by clinical assessment, rating scales and neuropsychological tests while the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ1-42, IL-1β and TNF-α by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: After 6 months, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) significantly decreased compared with baseline values to a similar extent in both groups. No significant differences existed between two groups in SBP or DBP. The patients displayed significantly higher Aβ1-42 and greatly lower levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in the telmisartan group versus the amlodipine group (P < 0.05). At 24 weeks, the patients in the telmisartan group had better mini-mental state examination (MMSE) (22.0 ± 3.4) and Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) (15 ± 5) scales scores than those taking amlodipine (MMSE (19.5 ± 2.8) and ADAS-cog (18 ± 5). Patients treated with telmisartan had better improvement on the MMSE (P < 0.05) and ADAS-cog (P < 0.05) scales compared with the amlodipine group by the end of study week 24. CONCLUSION: Telmisartan may delay the decreased level of Aβ1-42 and reduce the levels IL-1β and TNF-α in CSF so as to improve the cognitive function of elderly hypertensive patients with AD. With additional benefits in comparison with common antihypertensive drugs, it may offer a novel therapeutic strategy of AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".