Analytical modeling of contact mechanics of helical gear tooth by considering surface roughness effects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Release of metal debris from a pair of gear teeth is a consequence of their contact. Any excessive metal debris can lead to the onset of fatigue and failure. This paper aims to derive a contact mechanics-based model to obtain the energy absorption of helical gear teeth. The proposed model includes the roughness effect of teeth contact surfaces. The mean value of the asperity summit curvature, the standard deviation of the asperity height distribution and the area density of the asperity height distribution are the three statistical parameters that describe the micron-scale surface roughness. An explicit approximation is obtained to relate the contact load and the minimum surface separation and to estimate the energy loss. Then an analytical expression is derived for the plastic energy dissipation per cycle as a function of plasticity index for gear teeth. The proposed function can be applied in the design of gears by engineers and manufacturers. Additionally, a pertinent lumped mass at the area of interaction is assumed to describe the contact frequency and damping ratio using a nonlinear dynamic model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it