Use of a Noninvasive Brain-Penetrating Peptide-Drug Conjugate Strategy to Improve the Delivery of Opioid Pain Relief Medications to the Brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analgesic potency of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) has been shown to be 50-fold higher than morphine after intracerebral injection. However, the brain penetration of M6G is significantly lower than morphine, thus limiting its usefulness in pain management. Here, we created new entities by the conjugation of the angiopep-2 peptide (An2) that crosses the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 receptor-mediated transcytosis with either morphine or M6G. We demonstrated improvement of BBB permeability of these new entities compared with that of unconjugated M6G and morphine. Intravenous or subcutaneous administration of the An2-M6G conjugate exerted greater and more sustained analgesic activity than equivalent doses of either morphine or M6G. Likewise, subcutaneous An2-morphine induced a delayed but prolonged antinociceptive effect. The effects of these conjugates on the gastrointestinal tract motility were also evaluated. An2-morphine significantly reduced the intestinal transit time, whereas An2-M6G exhibited a reduced constipation profile, as compared with an equimolar dose of morphine. In summary, we have developed new brain-penetrant opioid conjugates exhibiting improved analgesia to side effect ratios. These results thus support the use of An2-carrier peptides as an innovative BBB-targeting technology to deliver effective drugs, such as M6G, for pain management. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) does not efficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 peptide ligand angiopep-2 may serve as an effective drug delivery system to the brain. Here, we demonstrated that the coupling of M6G to angiopep-2 peptide (An2) improves its brain penetration and significantly increases its analgesic potency. The An2-M6G conjugate has a favorable side effect profile that includes reduction of developing constipation. An2-M6G exhibits a unique pharmacodynamic profile with a better therapeutic window than morphine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".