MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018829287 · doi:10.3390/rs12091371

Automated Filtering of Multibeam Water-Column Data to Detect Relative Abundance of Giant Kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera)

2020· article· en· W3018829287 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre C. G. Schimel, Craig J. Brown, Daniel Ierodiaconou

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, State Government of Victoria
KeywordsKelp forestWater columnMacrocystis pyriferaEnvironmental scienceKelpRemote sensingGeologyOceanographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern multibeam echosounders can record backscatter data returned from the water above the seafloor. These water-column data can potentially be used to detect and map aquatic vegetation such as kelp, and thus contribute to improving marine habitat mapping. However, the strong sidelobe interference noise that typically contaminates water-column data is a major obstacle to the detection of targets lying close to the seabed, such as aquatic vegetation. This article presents an algorithm to filter the noise and artefacts due to interference from the sidelobes of the receive array by normalizing the slant-range signal in each ping. To evaluate the potential of the filtered data for the detection of aquatic vegetation, we acquired a comprehensive water-column dataset over a controlled experimental site. The experimental site was a transplanted patch of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) forest of known biomass and spatial configuration, obtained by harvesting several individuals from a nearby forest, measuring and weighing them, and arranging them manually on an area of seafloor previously bare. The water-column dataset was acquired with a Kongsberg EM 2040 C multibeam echosounder at several frequencies (200, 300, and 400 kHz) and pulse lengths (25, 50, and 100 μs). The data acquisition process was repeated after removing half of the plants, to simulate a thinner forest. The giant kelp plants produced evident echoes in the water-column data at all settings. The slant-range signal normalization filter greatly improved the visual quality of the data, but the filtered data may under-represent the true amount of acoustic energy in the water column. Nonetheless, the overall acoustic backscatter measured after filtering was significantly lower, by 2 to 4 dB on average, for data acquired over the thinned forest compared to the original experiment. We discuss the implications of these results for the potential use of multibeam echosounder water-column data in marine habitat mapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207