Parametric Modeling of EM Behavior of Microwave Components Using Combined Neural Networks and Hybrid-Based Transfer Functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuro-transfer function (neuro-TF) approaches have become more and more popular in parametric modeling for electromagnetic (EM) behavior of microwave components. Existing pole-residue-based neuro-TF approach has better capability of dealing with high-order problem than the rational-based neuro-TF approach, but has the discontinuity issue and the associated non-smoothness issue of the poles/residues when the geometrical variations become large while the rational-based neuro-TF approach does not have. This paper addresses this situation and presents a novel hybrid-based neuro-TF technique which systematically combines both pole-residue and rational formats of the transfer functions. Starting with the pole-residue-based transfer functions, we propose a novel technique to automatically identify the poles/residues that are smooth-continuous and the poles/residues that have the discontinuity and non-smoothness issues. The proposed technique converts the poles/residues that have those issues into the coefficients of the rational-based transfer function to solve the discontinuity and non-smoothness issues in the existing pole-residue-based neuro-TF approach. The proposed technique remains the smooth-continuous poles/residues in the pole-residue format of the transfer function to maintain the capability of handling high-order problem. Compared with the existing neuro-TF modeling methods, the proposed technique can obtain better accuracy in challenging applications of large geometrical variations and high order. The proposed technique is illustrated by two examples of parametric modeling of microwave components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".