MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018872491 · doi:10.18568/cmc.v17i48.2009

Crítica da inspiração nos processos comunicacionais do capitalismo “cool”

2020· article· pt· W3018872491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComunicação, Mídia e Consumo · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCapitalismSociologyPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem como objetivo tratar da inspiração, como elemento que identifica os processos comunicacionais relacionados com a cultura empreendedora. Nesse sentido, a publicização dos ideais, valores, prescrições dos agentes identificados com o empreendedorismo parte de um modelo comunicacional bem delimitado, cuja função principal é inspirar, ou seja, transformar o outro, que compõe seu auditório social (BAKHTIN, 1997). Essa transformação desejada seria, em última instância, a promoção do engajamento no capitalismo contemporâneo em sua face mais sedutora, que McGuigan (2009) define como cool capitalism. Em síntese, procuramos discutir as intersecções entre inspiração, empreendedorismo e o capitalismo neoliberal, ou sociedade neoliberal (conforme DARDOT; LAVAL, 2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it