MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018876664 · doi:10.20383/101.0116

A soil moisture and precipitation dataset from the Kenaston/Brightwater Creek basin, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2007 - 2017

2018· article· en· W3018876664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erica Tetlock, Brenda Toth, Tracy Rowlandson, Jaison Thomas Ambadan

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoamEnvironmental scienceWater contentPrecipitationHydrology (agriculture)Soil waterStructural basinMoistureRain gaugeGeologySoil scienceGeographyMeteorologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kenaston Network, located in the Brightwater Creek basin in central Saskatchewan, is a community monitoring network with a variety of monitoring instruments. The area is a typical agricultural region with both annually cropped fields and pasture sections. Dataset presented here is from the soil moisture and precipitation sites which are spread at two spatial scales (10 km x 10 km and 40 km x 40 km) over the monitoring region. Data from the summer months (May 1 – Sept 30) is included for 2007 – 2017. Each site has at least three Stevens Hydra Probe soil moisture sensors, inserted horizontally at depths of 5, 20, and 50 cm below the surface, with sites at the 10 km x 10 km scale instrumented with an additional vertically placed sensor, measuring over the depth 0-5 cm. Parameters reported from the probes are soil temperature, real dielectric constant, and soil moisture calculated using the Stevens loam calibration equation. All sites have one of two types of tipping bucket rain gauge (Onset RG3 or Hydrological Services TB3) to provide summer precipitation totals. All data from the network have been through a quality control/quality analysis process that includes a series of automated checks followed by a manual review of all sensor parameters. **Please note: This dataset is linked to an ESSD paper at https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-787-2019. The authors kindly request that you reference this paper in addition to the dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207