MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018933376 · doi:10.7202/1068505ar

Repenser « l’esprit du capitalisme » : une rétrospective

2020· article· fr· W3018933376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nabil Khoury

Bibliographic record

VenueAssurances et gestion des risques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCulture, Economy, and Development Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Max Weber introduit l’idée que le système capitaliste de production s’est développé dans les communautés calvinistes du XVII e siècle les rendant plus prospères que les communautés catholiques contemporaines, et ce grâce à l’apport indispensable d’un « esprit de capitalisme » fondé sur une éthique calviniste austère étrangère au catholicisme. Cette théorie demeure un point de référence incontournable auprès des chercheurs depuis bientôt cent ans. L’objet de cet article est de présenter une synthèse des contributions théoriques et empiriques qui ont marqué, surtout au cours des cinq dernières décennies, l’évolution de la recherche sur ce thème. Nous situerons ces contributions dans le courant progressiste de l’évolution de la pensée économique sur ce sujet, afin de mieux apprécier les nouvelles orientations de la recherche dans ce domaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssurances et gestion des risquesSame topicCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesFrench-language works237,207