MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018967742 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10502650.1

Interactive 3D Visualization and Dissemination of UAV-SfM Models for Virtual Outcrop Geology

2020· article· en· W3018967742 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul R. Nesbit

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcropVisualizationGeologyInteractive visualizationComputer graphics (images)Space (punctuation)3d modelComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of high resolution 3D datasets is being increasingly realized in an expanding number of geoscience applications. However, sharing of these datasets and interpretations requires end-users to have specialty software programs and high-end processing computers. Although user-friendly technological advances, such as uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) and structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry, provide geoscientists with tools to easily collect, process, and analyze 3D models at multiple scales, dissemination of results to the general public commonly revert to conventional 2D formats, such as (static) 2D maps, figures, and rigid animations/videos. To facilitate dissemination of complete 3D datasets and interpretations to a wider audience, we review three modern platforms that enable visualization, sharing, and publishing of various 3D formats. We demonstrate the capabilities and limitations of each visualization platform by presenting a 3D digital outcrop model (DOM) of an extensive exposure of fluvial channel belt deposits in a 1 km2 area of Dinosaur Provincial Park (Alberta, Canada) generated from UAV-SfM photogrammetry. Each visualization platform provides intuitive controls and accessibility on standard desktop computers through web-based browsers (e.g., Sketchfab and potree) or a standalone executable file developed through videogame engines, such as Unity or Unreal Engine. Proprietary viewers allow straightforward sharing of 3D models, but limit size, detail, and resolution and also have restricted means for accommodating interpretations. Open-source platforms afford more functionality, facilitate additional 3D datasets, and can provide customized visualization experiences for end-users, but may require more advanced coding experience. Visualization platforms examined within this study offer access to large 3D datasets without the need for specialized software and advanced computing hardware. Further development and use of such platforms has potential to enhance student education and improve scientific communication through unique customizable experiences that allow for democratization of high resolution 3D datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207