MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019059112 · doi:10.3233/jcm-204276

Acceleration slip regulation control for four-wheel independently drive electric vehicle based on fuzzy control

2020· article· en· W3019059112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarSimAccelerationSlip (aerodynamics)TorqueElectric vehicleControl theory (sociology)Automotive engineeringSlip ratioElectronic stability controlComputer scienceFuzzy control systemFuzzy logicSlip angleRange (aeronautics)Vehicle dynamicsPower (physics)EngineeringControl (management)PhysicsSteering wheel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve the acceleration performance and stability of the four-wheel independent drive (4WID) electric vehicle on low-adhesion road, a fuzzy control that doesn’t depend on accurate vehicle models is proposed. Taking the driving torque of one side wheel as a reference the slip rate is controlled by controlling the torque errors between the left and right wheels to a certain range. Carsim-Simulink co-simulation is used to analyze the acceleration stability of 4WID electric vehicle on low-adhesion road and μ-split road. The simulation results show that the wheel slip rate can be controlled within a reasonable range through proposed method, and the stability and safety of the vehicle can be effectively improved on the basis of ensuring the power performance of the vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it