MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019066037 · doi:10.1002/mop.32398

<scp>Ultra‐wideband</scp> fluidically steered antipodal Vivaldi antenna array

2020· article· en· W3019066037 on OpenAlex
Ian Goode, Carlos E. Saavedra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVivaldi antennaBeamwidthAntipodal pointBeam steeringMaterials scienceMicrostripOpticsWidebandAntenna (radio)Antenna arrayPhase (matter)Phase shift moduleBeam (structure)OptoelectronicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringAntenna measurementEngineeringInsertion lossMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An ultra‐wideband 1 × 4 antipodal Vivaldi antenna array with microfluidic beam steering is reported. The antipodal configuration is selected for its microstrip feed line, which is convenient for implementation of the phase‐shifting structure. Each antenna element uses a true‐time‐delay phase shifter consisting of nine microfluidic channels under its feed line in which deionized (DI) water, ɛ r = 77 + j 13 ( tan δ = 0.17 ) at 3 GHz, is pumped to change the speed of the propagating wave. The array was fabricated using a 1.52 mm thick substrate with ɛ r = 3.55 and tan δ = 0.0027 . Each antenna element and phase shifter measures 55 mm × 140 mm. Measurements show that the array yields up to 90° of beam steering from 3 to 6.5 GHz and up to 40° of steering from 6.5 to 10 GHz. The array has a maximum realized gain of 13.1 dBi, and a half‐power beamwidth of less than 40° for all configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it