Calgary Model in The Nursing Framework: An Integrative Literature Review / Modelo Calgary no Âmbito da Enfermagem: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Caracterizar a produção científica acerca da aplicação do Modelo Calgary de Avaliação Familiar, publicada em periódicos on-line da área de enfermagem. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura, realizada na BVS, Portal CAPES e PUBMED, cuja amostra correspondeu a 18 artigos publicados entre 2014 e 2019. Os dados foram coletados nos meses de agosto e setembro de 2019. Resultados: A maior concentração de publicações ocorreu nos anos de 2018 e 2017, com 4 (22,2%) publicações em cada ano. Com relação à abordagem dos estudos, predominaram os qualitativos, com 15 (83,3%) artigos. Quanto à modalidade das publicações, destaca-se os estudos originais. Conclusão: Os resultados revelaram que a produção científica investigada se destaca como uma temática relevante e vem gradativamente apresentando uma expansão no campo da enfermagem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".