L’authenticité comme valeur centrale de l’engagement religieux dans la culture de consommation: le cas des pratiquants bouddhistes en France et en République tchèque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans notre article, nous montrons que l’identité religieuse ne devrait pas nécessairement être appréhendée par le concept de converti mais plutôt comme une identité personnelle formée dans le cadre d’un style de vie. À travers l’étude des pratiquants bouddhistes en France et en République tchèque nous analysons les discours sur l’engagement religieux qui accentuent les sentiments intérieurs. De cette manière, différentes dimensions de l’engagement bouddhiste comme la pratique religieuse, le collectif, l’enseignement et la symbolique bouddhistes sont recadrés comme expression authentique de la subjectivité des pratiquants bouddhistes, se conformant au primat de l’authenticité. Nous estimons que cette authenticité est socialement construite au travers d’interactions sociales et par des processus sociaux macrosociologiques, dont les rapports sociaux de classe et l’éthos consumériste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".