Typification and the current taxonomic status of Laminaria agarum var. аsiaticum and Laminaria boryi (Agaraceae, Laminariales)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lectotypes are designated for Laminaria agarum var.аsiaticum and Laminaria boryi and a historical background for the typification of these names is provided.These taxa were described by De la Pylaie in 1830, according to materials collected from Kam chatka (northwest Pacific) and Newfoundland (northwest Atlantic), respectively.Based on the modern data of morphological features and distributional range of Agarum species in the World Ocean, we consider these taxa as synonyms of Agarum clathratum subsp.clathratum, that has wide distribution in the Northern Hemisphere.K e y w o r d s : lectotypification, taxonomic revision, Kamchatka, Newfoundland, Lami naria agarum var.аsiaticum, Laminaria boryi, Laminariales Р Е З Ю М Е Климова А.В., Клочкова Т.А., Клочкова Н.Г.Типификация и совре мен ный таксономический статус Laminaria agarum var.asiaticum и La mi na ria boryi (Agaraceae, Laminariales).В статье обозначены лектотипы наз ваний Laminaria agarum var.аsiaticum и Laminaria boryi и дано историческое обос нование для их типификации.Эти таксоны были описаны де Ла Пиляи в 1830 г. по материалам, собранным у берегов Камчатки (северозападная часть Тихого океана) и Ньюфаундленда (северозападная часть Атлантичес кого океана).На основе современных данных по морфологии и распрост ра нению представителей рода Agarum в Мировом океане, предложено рас смат ривать указанные выше таксоны в качестве синонимов широко рас про страненной в
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".