MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019355165 · doi:10.1139/cjss2013-009

Impact of supplemental poultry manure application on potato yield and soil properties on a loam soil in north-western New Brunswick

2014· article· en· W3019355165 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioOne Complete (BioOne) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoamManureAgronomySowingSoil waterYield (engineering)Petiole (insect anatomy)Chicken manureEnvironmental scienceBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Rees, H. W., Chow, T. L., Zebarth, B., Xing, Z., Toner, P., Lavoie, J. and Daigle, J.-L. 2014. Impact of supplemental poultry manure application on potato yield and soil properties on a loam soil in north-western New Brunswick. Can. J. Soil Sci. 94: 49-65. The effect of timing of supplementary poultry manure applications on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and quality and soil properties of degraded soils in the New Brunswick potato belt were assessed. Four treatments on an 11% slope consisted of a control (11% - Ctrl) and applications of 4 Mg ha-1 of fresh broiler poultry manure applied either in late fall (11% - F), pre-planting (11% - PP) or pre-hilling (11% - PH). Similar treatments were set out on an 8% slope with exception of the pre-planting treatment. Manure applications enhanced potato plant N status as measured by petiole concentration. Over the 3-yr experiment, poultry-manured treatments averaged 13 to 17% more annual total tuber yield and 19 to 34% more annual marketable tuber yield than the unmanured control. Poultry-manured treatments had fewer tubers in the small category and increased the proportion of tubers in the No. 1 and 10 oz. categories. Tuber yields were similar with fall-applied manure and with manure applied at pre-hilling. Manure did not induce either scab or hollow heart. Manure reduced tuber specific gravity. After three annual applications of poultry manure, soil P, K, B, Cu, Na, S and Zn increased significantly. Soil organic carbon did not change significantly after three annual poultry manure applications, but there was an increase in soil CO2 concentrations, earthworm populations and infiltration. Repeated manuring did not improve saturated hydraulic conductivity, matrix bulk density, field capacity, available-water-holding capacity or wet aggregate stability, and no consistent response in soil temperature or soil water content occurred. We conclude that low, repeated applications of poultry manure would benefit tuber yield and soil biological properties, but soil physical properties would be slower to change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.080 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it