MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019368313 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.12101409.v1

Mobile Crowd Sensing for Hypertensive Patient

2020· preprint· en· W3019368313 on OpenAlexaff
Ankit K. Patel, Jinan Fiaidhi, Harsh Kapadia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveRandom forestComputer scienceBlood pressureKey (lock)Classifier (UML)Machine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningMedicineComputer securityInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main aim is to detect Hypertension without considering Blood Pressure or any other medical test. The proposed method mainly focuses on generating huge database which contains symptoms of Hypertensive patients. In MCS environment, another key component is providing incentive to volunteers in-order to motivate them to take part in data collection phase. Feedback is given to the user about their current health status in form of incentive which is generated using Machine Learning technique like Random Forest Classifier

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207