MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019428658 · doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000696

Patient and family support in the era of fake e-medicine: food for thought from an international consensus panel

2020· editorial· en· W3019428658 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Mauri, Konstantinos Kamposioras, Dimitrios Tzachanis, Maria Tolia, Antonis Valachis, Mario Dambrosio, Filippo Alongi, Ramon Andrade de Mello, József Lövey, Alan Anthoney, Christos Christopoulos, Haytham Hamed Saraireh, Panteleimon Kountourakis, Εleftherios Kampletsas, Lampriani Tsali, Theodoros Tsakiridis, Ioannis Kosovitsas, Athanasios Soukovelos, Diamantina Lymperatou, Nikolaos P. Polyzos, George Zarkavelis

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicineCounterfeitAlternative medicineThe InternetTraditional medicinePolitical scienceWorld Wide WebPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fake internet medical information, parapharmacies and counterfeit drugs constitute a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars per year1–3 and pose a serious public health risk at the global level.4 Exposure of web visitors to fake and misleading information may decrease patients’ compliance to medically recommended treatments, promote the use of questionable and detrimental practices and jeopardise patient outcomes and survival.4–6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.155
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.155
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0170.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingFrench-language works237,207