MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019479832 · doi:10.25656/01:19256

„Und sie bewegt sich doch“ - Neue Steuerung und Governance in der öffentlichen Weiterbildung

2020· article· de· W3019479832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Schemmann

Bibliographic record

VenuePedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

van Ackeren, Isabell [Hrsg.]; Bremer, Helmut [Hrsg.]; Kessl, Fabian [Hrsg.]; Koller, Hans Christoph [Hrsg.]; Pfaff, Nicolle [Hrsg.]; Rotter, Caroline [Hrsg.]; Klein, Dominique [Hrsg.]; Salaschek, Ulrich [Hrsg.]: Bewegungen. Beiträge zum 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft. Opladen; Berlin; Toronto : Verlag Barbara Budrich 2020, S. 391-403. - (Schriften der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE)) Pädagogische Teildisziplin: Erwachsenenbildung / Weiterbildung; Bildungsorganisation, Bildungsplanung und Bildungsrecht;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0140.018
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research)Same topicSociology and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207