Direct loading of blood for plasma separation and diagnostic assays on a digital microfluidic device
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finger-stick blood sampling is convenient for point of care diagnostics, but whole blood samples are problematic for many assays because of severe matrix effects associated with blood cells and cell debris. We introduce a new digital microfluidic (DMF) diagnostic platform with integrated porous membranes for blood-plasma separation from finger-stick blood volumes, capable of performing complex, multi-step, diagnostic assays. Importantly, the samples can be directly loaded onto the device by a finger "dab" for user-friendly operation. We characterize the platform by comparison to plasma generated via the "gold standard" centrifugation technique, and demonstrate a 21-step rubella virus (RV) IgG immunoassay yielding a detection limit of 1.9 IU mL-1, below the diagnostic cut-off. We propose that this work represents a critical next step in DMF based portable diagnostic assays-allowing the analysis of whole blood samples without pre-processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it