MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single Endothelial Cell mRNA Sequencing Better Captures the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease Than Targeted Total Arterial Markers of Inflammation and Senescence

2020· article· en· W3019644573 on OpenAlexaff
Pauline Mury, Florian Wünnemann, Mélissa Beaudoin, Nathalie Thorin‐Trescases, Yves Hébert, Michel Pellerin, Michel Carrier, Louis P. Perrault, Guillaume Lettre, Éric Thorin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronary artery diseaseMedicineMyographAtheromaEndothelial dysfunctionEndotheliumArteryCardiologyInternal medicineInflammationVascular diseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endothelial dysfunction is the initial step towards atherosclerotic plaque development and coronary artery disease (CAD). Senescent endothelial cells (SnEC) have been linked to the atherosclerotic burden. In particular, the senescent‐associated secretory phenotype protein angiopoietin‐like 2 (ANGPTL2) was shown to be elevated in the plasma of CAD patients and related to the senescent cellular load in human internal mammary artery (IMA) segments discarded during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We tested the hypothesis that the accumulation of vascular SnEC causes endothelial dysfunction and precedes the appearance of atherosclerotic lesions. Discarded atheroma‐free IMA segments from 12 patients (11 men and 1 woman, 69±3 years) were collected during consecutive elective CABG surgeries. Arterial rings of IMA segments were mounted in a wire myograph to record isometric changes in tension: arteries were pre‐contracted with U46619, a synthetic analogue of PGH 2 , and endothelium‐dependent relaxations to increasing concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh) were recorded. The maximal relaxation (E max ) and the concentration of ACh inducing 50% of relaxation (EC 50 ) were calculated. Afterwards total mRNA was extracted from the IMA segments. Vascular gene expression of ANGPTL2 and p21 (senescence markers), and CD68 and PAI‐1 (inflammatory markers) were assessed by RT‐qPCR. In parallel, single‐cell RNA sequencing was performed in IMA segments from two age‐matched male patients obtained either during elective (stable CAD) or emergency (unstable CAD, with numerous risk factors) procedures, and differential gene expression was specifically analyzed in vascular EC. Endothelium‐dependent relaxations were characterized by E max (56±7 %, [18–100%], n=12) and pD 2 (‐log EC 50 : 6.9±0.1 [5.8–7.3], n=12). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their E max (< or > to 50%) to define low and high endothelial function; vascular gene expression of the 4 senescence and inflammatory markers were similar between the two groups, demonstrating that global arterial wall senescence and inflammation did not distinguish severity of endothelial dysfunction. We then used single‐cell mRNA sequencing and analysed the unbiased differential gene expression specifically in vascular EC. From the total IMA cellular counts, EC represented ~2%. Nine genes were identified that were differentially overexpressed in EC from unstable CAD patient that have been associated with senolytic drug targets and cardiovascular diseases (Table ), potentially attesting to the severity of endothelial dysfunction and CAD. In conclusion, unlike total arterial wall mRNA quantification, unbiased single‐cell mRNA sequencing identified differentially upregulated endothelial pathways that may contribute to the severity of the CAD by inducing precocious endothelial dysfunction and senescence. Top genes differentially expressed in endothelial cells between a stable and unstable CAD patient. Percentages represent the percent of endothelial cells expressing the gene in each patient dataset. P‐values are Bonferroni corrected. Stable CAD patient Unstable CAD patient p‐value Gene Associated CVD disorder or drug target 0.0% 41.7% 0.00061 TGFB2 Atrial fibrillation 0.0% 41.7% 0.00061 SQLE Statins 2.9% 58.3% 0.00090 RPPH1 Quercetin (senolytic drug) 7.1% 66.7% 0.00339 ARL14EP Systolic blood pressure 25.7% 100.0% 0.00914 RPL17

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207