MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019665491 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.4987

Carbone Inc. : risques et promesses du marché du carbone

2019· article· fr· W3019665491 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Antoine Verret-Hamelin

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la lutte contre les changements climatiques, les marchés du carbone sont vantés pour leur efficience, leur réalisme et leur équité. Le présent article vise à examiner de façon critique ces arguments à la lumière de certains écueils éthiques : un marché du carbone nourrit une forme d’hubris climatique, et consiste en un mécanisme complexe, partisan, opaque, qui s’applique à de grandes entreprises dotées de moyens économiques, politiques et informationnels étendus. Selon toute probabilité, les acteurs régis par un marché du carbone auront le pouvoir de manipuler ce mécanisme à leur avantage économique court-termiste. Un examen attentif du marché du carbone québécois permet de corroborer ce point de vue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicClimate Change and GeoengineeringFrench-language works237,207