MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Inspired Hypoxia and Hyperoxia on Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Reactivity

2020· article· en· W3019731000 on OpenAlexaff
Brendan Lazar, Stéphanie Nguyen, Matthew Betton, Evan Olar, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperoxiaVagal toneHypoxia (environmental)ExpirationCardiologyAnesthesiaVentilation (architecture)Respiratory systemInternal medicineOxygenationHeart rateLung volumesMedicineChemistryHeart rate variabilityLungOxygenBlood pressurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is the normal fluctuation in heart rate (HR) in phase with the respiratory cycle, whereby HR increases during inspiration and decreases during expiration. The underlying mechanisms and potential utility remain elusive. RSA magnitude is thought to be affected by autonomic balance, whereby a dominant parasympathetic nervous system (NS) at rest facilitates RSA, and sympathetic NS activation attenuates its magnitude. Carotid body stimulation via acute hypoxia elicits sympathetic activation, whereas hyperoxia facilitates sympathetic withdrawal. In addition, RSA has been hypothesized to facilitate improvements in ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching, improving oxygenation when hypoxic. We hypothesized that (a) acute hypoxia and hyperoxia would increase and decrease the magnitude of RSA reactivity, respectively and (b) when hypoxic, those with larger RSA magnitude during deep breathing would have larger improvements in oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ). Healthy participants (n=13) were instrumented with a pneumotachometer and coached to breathe at three percentages (30, 40 and 50%) of their forced vital capacity (FVC) using visual cues while inspiring room air (21% F I O 2 ), hypoxia (13.5% F I O 2 ), hyperoxia (100% F I O 2 ). RSA was quantified via the peak‐valley approach, and RSA reactivity (RSA R ) was quantified via linear regression to calculate the slope of changes in RSA magnitude across all three FVC levels. RSA magnitude increased linearly with increases in inspired tidal volume in all three gases (R 2 >0.98). No significant differences were found in RSA R slopes between room air (0.32±0.2 ΔBPM/%FVC), hypoxia (0.33±0.26 ΔBPM/%FVC), and hyperoxia (0.34±0.26 ΔBPM/%FVC; P=0.97). There was also no correlation between RSA magnitude during deep breathing (50%FVC) and the associated improvements in SpO 2 in hypoxia (r=−0.11, P=0.72). Given that RSA R is not affected by oxygen availability, our data provides evidence that hypoxic stimulation of the carotid bodies elicits activation of both arms of the autonomic nervous system, maintaining autonomic balance and normal heart rate variability. In addition, RSA magnitude does not appear to bestow advantages on V/Q matching in the context of acute hypoxia. Support or Funding Information MRU Faculty of Science and Technology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207