MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019750997 · doi:10.1503/cjs.005620

Guidance for management of cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020· article· en· W3019750997 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Christian Finley, Anubha Prashad, Natasha Camuso, Corinne Daly, Armen Aprikian, Chad G. Ball, J. Bentley, Dhany Charest, Paola Fata, Lucy Helyer, Daniel O’Connell, Husein Moloo, Andrew Seely, Joel Werier, Toni Zhong, Craig C. Earle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityCanadian Society of Plastic SurgeonsCanadian Association of Thoracic SurgeonsHealth Sciences CentreOttawa HospitalCanadian Society of Colon and Rectal SurgeonsCanadian Partnership Against CancerUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Urological AssociationUniversity of AlbertaSunnybrook Health Science CentreCanadian Association of General SurgeonsMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPartenariat Canadien Contre Le CancerUniversity Health NetworkAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCancer surgerySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Intensive care medicineDiseaseCancerGeneral surgeryMedical emergencySurgeryInfectious disease (medical specialty)VirologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, delaying lifesaving cancer surgeries must be done with extreme caution and thoughtfulness. Modelling indicates that delays in high-risk cancer surgeries beyond 6 weeks could affect long-term outcomes for thousands of Canadians. Consequently, it is possible that postponing cancer surgery without consideration of its implications could cost more lives than can be saved by diverting all surgical resources to COVID-19. This article provides general guidance on supporting curative surgical treatment where appropriate and with available resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0100.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.263
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207