MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The issues of underage and transgender childrens rights exercise when receiving health care

2020· article· en· W3019899315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicne pravo · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgenderLegislationHealth careNorm (philosophy)Christian ministryPsychologyMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the case law and problem theory that arise when exercising the right to medical care for minors and transgender children. The necessity of increasing the age to 16 years of underage children in an independent application for medical care is substantiated. The rights of transgender children are analyzed and their rights to receive medical care are identified. The participation of children and adolescents (10-18 years - defined by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine) in medical decision making should be offered in proportion to their developmental opportunities, to understand the nature and consequences of their medical problem, and to understand the foreseeable risks and benefits of the treatment offered. Amendments to the legislation on the right to child health care are proposed. The rights of the child in the field of medical care are extremely relevant, since the problem of researching the age from which a minor child is entitled to receive medical care is not in doubt, given that in practice the norm of Part 2 of Art. 284 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is not implemented. We consider age issues controversial. Because, in practice, a 14-year-old child is treated by parents, not alone. Any child (including transgender) is a patient from the time they see a doctor or healthcare facility. However, Part 2-3 of Art. 284 of the Civil Code of Ukraine a natural person who has reached the age of fourteen and who has sought the provision of medical care, has the right to choose a doctor and to choose the methods of treatment in accordance with his recommendations. The provision of medical care to an individual who has reached the age of fourteen is carried out with his or her consent. The question is how often do children at the age of 14 choose a doctor or treatment? It should be noted that the legal structure of informed voluntary consent of a child in legal relations for providing her medical care in the legislation of Ukraine consists of the following provisions: Informed voluntary consent to medical care for a child under the age of 14 must be provided by the parents or other substitute persons in accordance with the law, that is, they only sign the relevant documents. Upon reaching the age of 14, a minor shall, inter alia, be entitled to informed consent for medical intervention. Appropriate written consent must be signed by both the child's representative and the child himself. An 18-year-old person acquires all civil rights and obligations, including in the field of medical care. The same applies to minors who have acquired full civil capacity before - on the grounds provided for in Art. 34 and 35 of the CCU. Therefore, providing informed consent to a medical intervention by a minor under the age of 14 years is inconsistent in Ukrainian civil law. On the one hand, the legislature granted such persons the right to consent to medical intervention, on the other - to deprive them of the right to information about their health status and to refuse medical intervention. Apparently, the legislator should consistently “tie” the age of a minor patient to a certain amount of his or her legal capacity in the context of medical care, and in my opinion, this should be 16 years of age. Contradictions also arise in the child's right to choose a doctor and obtain information about his or her health status. Art. 38 of the Law of Ukraine "Fundamentals of the legislation of Ukraine on health care" (hereinafter - the Law "On health care") gives the right from 14 years to the free choice of a doctor, if the latter can offer his services, and the choice of treatment methods according to his recommendations , and Art. 39 only gives adults the right to full information about their health. This legal conflict is proposed to be eliminated by amending Art. 39 of the Law on Health, stating: "A patient who has reached the age of fourteen is entitled to receive reliable and complete information about his health status, including access to relevant medical records concerning his health" I". you can agree with this, but given that this right would arise from the age of 16. Substantiating the provision that a child at 14 years old can not make informed decisions when applying to a doctor and choose the methods of treatment, you should turn to medical psychology, psychiatry. Generally, adolescence is associated with the restructuring of the child’s body - puberty. The latter aspect is determined on the basis of the concept of puberty (from the Latin pubeszere - hair coverage). The puberty period is the stage when a person reaches puberty. The lines of mental and physiological development do not go in parallel, because of which the individual limits of entry into puberty vary greatly. Some children enter puberty earlier, others later. It should be noted that major structural and functional changes in the brain are completed by the age of 14 when it reaches its final volume and weight. The ratio between gray matter and neurons acquires its final stage of development at about 18 years. Children 16 years and older are generally considered Gillick-competent. Gillick competence is a term that originated in England, is used in medical law and addresses the question: Can a child under the age of 16 consent to medical care without parental permission? In Canada, in 10 provinces and 3 territories, the right to receive medical assistance for minors is different, for example in the Yukon, East-West and Nunavut territories, the right to medical assistance arises with the age of 19. In other provinces of 18 or 16 years old, if they can agree to medical treatment and are able to understand the nature and consequences of treatment, their decision is in their own interest, health and well-being. Over the last decade, more and more children and adolescents have been identified as transgender and gender diverse (TGD). Often, they and their parents first seek primary care paediatrician for guidance and support. Therefore, in 2018, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released a policy statement on youth health issues with TGD. AAP recognizes that many paediatricians are under-trained in the field and therefore need to build up their knowledge base and expertise to provide medically competent care. Although most sexual and gender minorities are healthy and well-adjusted, some TGDs are at increased risk for mental health, including anxiety, depression, and abuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.033
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicne pravoSame topicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawFrench-language works237,207