An Unsupervised Regularization and Dropout based Deep Neural Network and Its Application for Thermal Error Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the large size of the heavy duty machine tool-foundation systems, space temperature difference is high related to thermal error, which affects to system’s accuracy greatly. The recent highly focused deep learning technology could be an alternative in thermal error prediction. In this paper, a thermal prediction model based on a self-organizing deep neural network (DNN) is developed to facilitate accurate-based training for thermal error modeling of heavy-duty machine tool-foundation systems. The proposed model is improved in two ways. Firstly, a dropout self-organizing mechanism for unsupervised training is developed to prevent co-adaptation of the feature detectors. In addition, a regularization enhanced transfer function is proposed to further reduce the less important weights of the process and improve the network feature extraction capability and generalization ability. Furthermore, temperature sensors are used to acquire temperature data from the heavy-duty machine tool and concrete foundation. In this way, sample data of thermal error predictive model are repeatedly collected from the same locations at different times. Finally, accuracy of the thermal error prediction model was validated by thermal error experiments, thus laying the foundation for subsequent studies on thermal error compensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".