MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Knockdown of ANGPTL2 promotes cardiac left ventricular dysfunction in mice via up‐regulation of NOX4

2020· article· en· W3019927844 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pauline Labbé, Cécile Martel, Yanfen Shi, Marc‐Antoine Gillis, Natacha Duquette, Maya Mamarbachi, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Nathalie Thorin‐Trescases, Éric Thorin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene knockdownNOX4Internal medicineCardiologyCardiac dysfunctionChemistryMedicineGeneOxidative stressBiochemistryHeart failureNADPH oxidase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Angiopoietin‐like 2 (ANGPTL2) is a pro‐inflammatory and pro‐oxidative glycoprotein that induces vascular endothelial dysfunction in mice and promotes atherosclerosis. Higher circulating levels of ANGPTL2 have been reported in patients with heart failure, but the potentially deleterious effect of ANGPTL2 on cardiac function is ill defined. Our aim was to investigate the cardiac function of adult mice knockdown for angptl2 (KD mice). Hypothesis Based on the available data in the literature, we hypothesized that KD for angptl2 would be cardioprotective. Methods Cardiac function was measured by high frequency echocardiography in adult 7‐month old KD and wild‐type (WT) littermates. Gene expression was measured by quantitative RT‐PCR. Results In contrast to our hypothesis, when compared to WT mice (n=32), KD mice (n=31) exhibited a left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, characterized by a reduced fractional shortening (35.8±1.0 vs 32.2±1.2%, p<0.05), a reduced ejection fraction (71.6±1.3 vs 66.4±1.8%, p<0.05), a lower lateral (2.3±0.1 vs 2.1±0.1 cm/s, p<0.05) and septal (2.5±0.1 vs 2.2±0.1 cm/s, p<0.05) contractility. This LV systolic dysfunction observed in KD mice was reproduced in WT mice exposed to a cardiac pressure overload generated by transverse aortic constriction (TAC); in KD mice, TAC did not further alter cardiac function. Interestingly, we observed that cardiac NADPH oxidase Nox4 mRNA expression tended to be higher in KD mice (+13%, p>0.05). NOX4 is known to produce H 2 O 2 , a deleterious hypertrophic stimulus in cardiomyocytes. Cardiac Nox4 was strongly and negatively correlated with fractional shortening (r=−0.836, p<0.001) and ejection fraction (r=−0.839, p<0.001) in KD mice only (sham and TAC mice, n=15), i.e. the higher Nox4 , the worse LV dysfunction. In contrast, Nox4 expression was not correlated with markers of LV dysfunction in WT mice (sham and TAC, n=12; p>0.05). We then tested the effects of repressing, or not, cardiac expression of Nox4 by a single injection of cardiac specific associated adenovirus AAV9 delivering a NOX4 targeted shRNA (shNOX4) or a scramble shRNA (SCR), in both WT and KD mice. The shNOX4, which significantly reduced cardiac Nox4 mRNA expression (‐34%, p<0.05), fully reversed LV systolic dysfunction in KD mice (Table ). In contrast, in WT mice AAV9‐shNOX4 had no effect (Table ). Conclusion Knockdown of ANGPTL2 promotes LV systolic dysfunction that can be reversed by the decrease of NOX4 expression in the heart of KD mice. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT‐162446) and by the Foundation of the Montreal Heart Institute. WT‐SCR (n=5) KD‐SCR (n=7) WT‐shNOX4 (n=8) KD‐shNOX4 (n=5) Fractional shortening (%) 38.6±2.8 27.7±1.7 35.3±1.8 37.4±2.4 Ejection fraction (%) 74.9±3.5 60.1±2.7 71.1±2.2 73.7±3.0 Lateral contractility (cm/s) 2.5±0.1 1.7±0.1 2.4±0.1 2.3±0.1 Septal contractility (cm/s) 2.7±0.1 2.0±0.1 2.6±0.1 2.7±0.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207