MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AUTONOMIA DAS CRIANÇAS VERSUS CONTROLE INSTITUCIONAL: UMA ANÁLISE DA AGÊNCIA INFANTIL EM UMA CASA ABRIGO DE IMPERATRIZ

2020· article· pt· W3019988944 on OpenAlexaff
Jéssica de Sousa Lima, Emilene Leite de Sousa

Bibliographic record

VenueREPOCS - Revista Pós Ciências Sociais · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta pesquisa dedica-se à análise da construção da autonomia infantil em crianças em situações de abrigo. As Casas Abrigo são espaços cuja organização repousa no excesso de regras e controle do tempo, do espaço e das ações infantis. Logo, esta pesquisa dedicou-se a investigar as estratégias através das quais as crianças - da Casa da Criança em Imperatriz, Maranhão – constroem sua individualidade junto ao grupo. Embora nestas instituições o controle excessivo não deixe espaço para a agência infantil, as crianças criam estratégias para garantir sua autonomia, burlando as regras estipuladas. Ora, em que situações as crianças fazem escolhas, se vivem sob constante observação dos cuidadores? De que forma imprimem suas impressões e sua individualidade? Este artigo mergulha no universo das crianças em situação de abrigo e revela seu modo de transformar um contexto de institucionalização em lar, marcando-o com sua agência. Este é um empreendimento etnográfco em construção.Palavras-chave: Infância. Abrigo. Agência. Autonomia. Individualidade.CHILDREN’S AUTONOMY VERSUS INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: AN ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN’S AGENCY AT A SHELTER HOME IN IMPERATRIZ CITYAbstractThis research analyzes the construction of children’s autonomy in shelter situations. Shelter Homes spaces are organized based on an excess of rules controlling children’s time and space, as well as their actions.Therefore, this research focused on investigating the strategies used by children – from Casa da Criança in Imperatriz, in Maranhão – to build their individuality in the group. In these institutions, even though the excess of control leaves no room for children’s agency, children create strategiesto guarantee their autonomy by circumventing the stipulated rules. Well, in what situations do children make choices if they live under constant observation of caregivers? How do they record their impressionsand their individuality? This article delves into the world of sheltered children and reveals their way of transforming an institutionalizationcontext into a home, marking it with their agency. This is an ethnographicaction under construction.Keywords: Childhood. Shelter. Agency. Autonomy. Individuality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREPOCS - Revista Pós Ciências SociaisSame topicChildren's Rights and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207