MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive ANN based Single PI Controller for Nine-Level PUC Inverter

2019· article· en· W3020033122 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Babaie, Mohammad Sharifzadeh, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)CapacitorController (irrigation)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceConvertersVoltageInverterMATLABPerceptronPID controllerPower (physics)EngineeringElectronic engineeringControl engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Temperature controlArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an Adaptive Proportional Integral (API) control strategy to regulate the capacitors voltage and load current of Nine-Level Packed U-Cell (PUC9) inverter in stand-alone mode of operation. PI is a linear control method which has been widely used in power converter topologies due to simple implementation. However, applying PI method to the power converters as nonlinear systems causes several problems like steady state error, difficulties of control factors tuning and instability in presence of uncertainties and disturbances. In the proposed API method, a single PI controller is used to adjust both capacitors voltage and load current amplitudes. A Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is also trained by Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm to adapt the capacitors voltage references so that eliminates steady state error of PI and stabilizes the PUC9 voltages and current in the presence of parameters variation. Simulation results obtained by MATLAB/Simulink confirm high performance of the API.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207