MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Probabilistic Models for Residential and Commercial Loads with High Time Resolution

2019· article· en· W3020126078 on OpenAlexaff
Sami M. Alshareef, Walid G. Morsi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoad profileProbabilistic logicElectricityConsumption (sociology)Residential areaScale (ratio)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringCivil engineeringArtificial intelligenceGeographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops the annual load profiles for residential load and two types of commercial loads, located at the same climate zone characterized as mixed-marine. Each annual load profile is generated based on a probabilistic approach, in an hourly scale, and assessed based on external validity indices relying on both supervised learning and unsupervised learning. Furthermore, the paper presents a method to increase the daily resolution of each generated profile from 24 samples per day representing 24 hours, to 120 samples in each hour, increasing the daily profile to 2,880 samples. For illustration, the proposed method is applied on the generated residential and one of the commercial load profiles. This study contributes to the literature by developing numerical load profiles for residential and commercial loads. The residential load profile can be used to represent the electricity consumption in the residential sector while the commercial load profiles can be utilized to represent the electricity consumption in the commercial sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207