MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020153229 · doi:10.1101/2020.04.23.058883

The Viral Polymerase Complex Mediates the Interaction of vRNPs with Recycling Endosomes During SeV Assembly

2020· preprint· en· W3020153229 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emmanuelle Genoyer, Katarzyna Kulej, Chuan-Tien Hung, Patricia A. Thibault, Kristopher D. Azarm, Toru Takimoto, Benjamin A. García, Benhur Lee, Seema S. Lakdawala, Matthew D. Weitzman, Carolina B. López

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanUniversity of PennsylvaniaNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyRibonucleoproteinEndosomeViral replicationCell biologyViral matrix proteinViral entryPolymeraseNucleoproteinVirologyViral structural proteinSendai virusViral proteinVirusRNAGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Paramyxoviruses are negative sense single-stranded RNA viruses that comprise many important human and animal pathogens, including human parainfluenza viruses. These viruses bud from the plasma membrane of infected cells after the viral ribonucleoprotein complex (vRNP) is transported from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane via Rab11a-marked recycling endosomes. The viral proteins that are critical for mediating this important initial step in viral assembly are unknown. Here we use the model paramyxovirus, murine parainfluenza virus 1, or Sendai virus (SeV), to investigate the roles of viral proteins in Rab11a-driven virion assembly. We previously reported that infection with SeV containing high levels of copy-back defective viral genomes (DVGs) generates heterogenous populations of cells. Cells enriched in full-length virus produce viral particles containing standard or defective viral genomes, while cells enriched in DVGs do not, despite high levels of defective viral genome replication. Here we take advantage of this heterogenous cell phenotype to identify proteins that mediate interaction of vRNPs with Rab11a. We examine the role of matrix protein and nucleoprotein and determine that they are not sufficient to drive interaction of vRNPs with recycling endosomes. Using a combination of mass spectrometry and comparative protein abundance and localization in DVG- and FL-high cells, we identify viral polymerase complex components L and, specifically, its cofactor C proteins as interactors with Rab11a. We find that accumulation of these proteins within the cell is the defining feature that differentiates cells that proceed to viral egress from cells which remain in replication phases. IMPORTANCE Paramyxoviruses are a family of viruses that include a number of pathogens with significant burdens on human health. Particularly, human parainfluenza viruses are an important cause of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in children for which there are no vaccines or direct acting antivirals. These cytoplasmic replicating viruses bud from the plasma membrane and coopt cellular endosomal recycling pathways to traffic viral ribonucleoprotein complexes from the cytoplasm to the membrane of infected cells. The viral proteins required for viral engagement with the recycling endosome pathway are still not known. Here we use the model paramyxovirus Sendai virus, or murine parainfluenza virus 1, to investigate the role of viral proteins in this initial step of viral assembly. We find that viral polymerase components large protein L and accessory C proteins are necessary for engagement with recycling endosomes. These findings are important in identifying viral proteins as potential targets for development of antivirals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207