MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020166022 · doi:10.29375/01237047.3856

Transformando la enfermería a través del conocimiento: resultados del programa de guías de buenas prácticas de la Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO)

2020· article· es· W3020166022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedunab · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El programa de Guías de Buenas Prácticas (BPG Program) fue lanzado en 1999 por la RNAO y fue financiado por el Ministerio de Salud de Ontario. El propósito de este programa, desde su inicio, ha sido apoyar a las enfermeras proporcionándoles guías basadas en la evidencia para el cuidado del paciente en diversos contextos y sectores de la salud. Con ya cincuenta y cuatro guías en inglés, y otros idiomas inclusive, en su mayoría traducidas al español, se facilita su aseso libre de costo a millones de enfermeras y demás profesionales sanitarios en todo el mundo (www.rnao.ca).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it