MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020188946 · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14443

Utility of Postmortem Vitreous Beta‐Hydroxybutyrate Testing for Distinguishing Sudden from Prolonged Deaths and for Diagnosing Ketoacidosis

2020· article· en· W3020188946 on OpenAlexaff
Kristina‐Ana Klaric, Christopher M. Milroy, Jacqueline L. Parai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Forensic Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetoacidosisMedicineDiabetic ketoacidosisInternal medicineAKASudden deathGastroenterologyReceiver operating characteristicDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyType 1 diabetesInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of vitreous beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) on 967 forensic cases over a two-year period was conducted. Cases were sorted into six categories of death: (i) sudden traumatic/non-natural (ST), (ii) sudden natural (SN), (iii) prolonged traumatic/non-natural (PT), (iv) prolonged natural (PN), (v) diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and (vi) alcoholic ketoacidosis (AKA). The mean BHB for all cases was 1.67 mmol/L (17.4 mg/dL; range: 0.11-18.02 mmol/L). The numbers of DKA, AKA, PN, PT, SN, and ST deaths were 21, 5, 155, 258, 275, and 253, respectively. Their mean vitreous BHBs were as follows: 11.04 mmol/L (DKA), 8.88 mmol/L (AKA), 1.56 mmol/L (PN), 1.55 mmol/L (PT), 1.26 mmol/L (SN), and 1.38 mmol/L (ST). There was a statistically significant difference between the mean BHBs of the PN and SN death groups (p < 0.001), as well as between those of the PT and ST death groups (p = 0.004). Given the overlapping ranges seen between the prolonged and sudden death groups, the identified differences did not hold clinical significance. In addition, we sought to determine a threshold value for vitreous BHB to definitely diagnose cases of ketoacidosis. BHB threshold concentrations between 2.5 and 5 mmol/L produced sensitivities >92% and specificities >96%. A receiver operator characteristic curve found 3.43 mmol/L to be the optimal cutoff value, demonstrating a specificity of 98.3% and a sensitivity of 96.2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Forensic SciencesSame topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207