MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020200414 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v4i2.957

L’importance d’instaurer un climat de confiance pour profiter pleinement de la démarche des cercles d’auteurs

2020· article· fr· W3020200414 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brigitte Rainville, Élaine Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsCommission Scolaire des Hautes Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, une enseignante témoigne de l’importance qu’elle attribue au fait d’installer un climat favorable aux échanges avant de démarrer les cercles d’auteurs. Elle partage, en toute humilité, quelques moyens pour y parvenir devenus, au fil du temps, des incontournables dans sa classe. Elle expose d’abord comment elle s’y prend pour développer un climat de classe bienveillant, puis, pour donner le goût d’écrire à ses élèves. Elle explique finalement comment elle met en place, de façon progressive et à l’aide de la modélisation, ses premiers cercles d’auteurs, et expose quelques problèmes rencontrés ainsi que des pistes de solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207