MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020226259 · doi:10.1134/s086959112002006x

1860-Ma I-Shaped Mafic Sills in the Murmansk Craton, Eastern Fennoscandia: Petrology and Tectonic Setting of Within-plate Mafic Events during Nuna Assembly

2020· article· en· W3020226259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. V. Stepanova, А. В. Самсонов, Yu. О. Larionova, С. В. Егорова, A. A. Арзамасцев, Е. Б. Сальникова, R. V. Veselovskiy, K. G. Erofeeva, М. В. Стифеева

Bibliographic record

VenuePetrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaficSillGeologyGeochemistryCratonFractional crystallization (geology)ArcheanMantle plumeMantle (geology)PetrologyLithosphereTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1860-Ma within-plate mafic rocks of the Eastern Murman Sill Province were studied in the northern part of the Murmansk Craton, where they compose sheet bodies (sills) up to 100 m thick in Archean granitoids and gneisses. The sills have a simple inner structure, show no macroscopic signs of in situ differentiation even in large bodies, and consist of homogenous medium-grained poikilophitic dolerites weakly varying in composition. Minor variations in mineral and chemical composition of the rocks allow us to regard the mafic sills as I-shaped sills. Their homogeneity is likely caused by the rapid crystallization of aphyric magmas. The studied sills are close to N-MORB in major-element composition, but significantly differ in trace element signatures. The low Cr and Ni concentrations in the dolerites indicate the high degrees of fractional crystallization, while the low HREE and HFSE contents suggest that primary komatiite melts were formed through the high-degree melting of a depleted mantle source. The absence of phenocrysts in chilled dolerites prevented the use mineralogic and petrographic criteria for estimating the crystallization conditions in intermediate magma chambers. AlphaMELTS 1.9 and PRIMELT3 MEGA modelling results indicate that the primary melts could be formed through a high-degree melting of ascending high-temperature mantle plume, with subsequent contamination and fractional crystallization in mid-crustal intermediate magma chambers. The Nd and Sr isotopic composition of the dolerites and constituent minerals suggests that the crustal contamination included several stages. The first, most significant crustal contribution (up to 10%) was related to the contamination by Archean tonalites in the intermediate mid-crustal chambers. This provided negative εNd values and radiogenic Sr isotopic composition (Sri = 0.702–0.704) in the dolerites. The second stage included the upper-crustal contamination during lateral propagation of melts along gentle weakened zones, which resulted in the wide variations of Sr-Nd isotopic composition in rocks and minerals. The third stage was related to the contamination by 87Sr-enriched fluid that is supported by the sharp increase of Sri (up to 0.708) at constant Nd isotopic composition in gabbro-pegmatites. Such fluid could be formed via biotite dehydration caused by heating of host granites by large volume of emplaced mafic melts. The age, volume, and composition of the studied dolerites and similarity with coeval mafic rocks in the Superior Craton indicate that the I-shaped mafic sills in the Murmansk Craton could be formed on the periphery of the Circum Superior large igneous province. It suggests that the Murmansk Craton of the Fennoscandian Shield and the Superior Craton of the Canadian Shield at 1860 Ma were joined into a single consolidated lithospheric block that host within-plate mafic rocks and likely represented an early core of the Paleoproterozoic Nuna supercontinent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207