MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020371609 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30531-6

Delayed versus early initiation of renal replacement therapy for severe acute kidney injury: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

2020· review· en· W3020371609 on OpenAlexafffund
Stèphane Gaudry, David Hajage, Nicolas Bénichou, Khalil Chaïbi, Saber Davide Barbar, Alexander Zarbock, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Ron Wald, Sean M. Bagshaw, Nattachai Srisawat, Alain Combes, Guillaume Géri, Tukaram Jamale, Agnès Dechartres, Jean‐Pierre Quenot, Didier Dreyfuss

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisRenal replacement therapyAcute kidney injuryClinical trialMEDLINESystematic reviewIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.605
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations235
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207